AI Visibility Scorecard
rigormd.com · Healthcare
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read RigorMD, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 4 times
Claude · Meta AI
#306,179 of 923,684 in Healthcare for AI visibility
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.1/10
75
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Transactable · 75/100
0
AI Adoption
iNone detected · 0/100
from our crawl and measurement
"A pre-submission methods-and-statistics check for clinical research manuscripts: design and claim classification, appraisal across two engines and multiple passes with only recurring." That is how RigorMD introduces itself. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.1 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, SoftwareApplication, WebSite), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Weak
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Fair
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.1/10, RigorMD has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Seven domains, every manuscript. The first question is always: does the design support the claim?
DOMAIN 01Design / claim fitWhether a causal, comparative, or equivalence claim is supported by the study design actually used.DOMAIN 02Results / conclusion alignmentWhether the abstract, results, and conclusions agree — without spin or reframed null findings.DOMAIN 03Statistical appropriatenessModels, power, missing-data handling, and multiplicity, matched to the design and endpoints.DOMAIN 04Reporting guideline.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for RigorMD
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for RigorMD.
Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/rigormd
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for RigorMD." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/rigormd
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform