AI Visibility Scorecard
citusops.com · Technology
Borderline visible. AI bots can crawl Rapax, but the structured-data signals are thin - you are at real risk of being skipped when buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for a recommendation.
AI engines read this profile 1 times
Claude
#1,299,542 of 2,705,505 in Technology for AI visibility
<1
4
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 4/10
30
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Basic · 30/100
12
AI Adoption
iBasic · 12/100
from our crawl and measurement
Rapax works in Technology. To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity, though, it is barely visible: it scores 4.0 out of 10.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage), an llms.txt file for AI models and a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Fair
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Fair
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Strong
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 4/10, Rapax is crawlable but under-signaled - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
What happens when one line card fails?
Forty-nine alarms. One root cause. Forty-eight subscribers who don’t know yet. An OLT line card fails at Kings Garden. Every ONT behind it loses GPON signal and reports independently. Under a manual model that is an engineer reading forty-nine rows to work out they describe one event — thirty to sixty minutes before anyone knows which customers are affected.
Could you have seen it coming?
Yes. That line card ran at 91°C against a 55°C daily average, and its optical power fell from −18 dBm to −30 dBm over the three hours before it failed. The signal was there the whole time. Nobody was watching that particular metric on that particular card, because nobody can watch every metric on every card. That is what continuous monitoring is for — not dashboards for people to stare at, but agents that notice.
What does Rapax actually do?
Six AI agents, each owning a layer of network operations. FrankIntercepts incoming support tickets. Deflects what your knowledge base can answer, auto-closes routine questions, validates intake, and escalates the rest with context attached.OscarContinuous operational briefing. Removes the time managers spend joining bridges and pulling status.WadeInstitutional memory.
How do you find out if it works on your network?
You run it on your network. Rapax deploys in five days. You evaluate for thirty against success criteria you define in writing before anything is signed, for $25,000 — credited against the license if you move forward. If it does not meet them, the evaluation ends and you owe nothing further. The ask is fifteen minutes, not a demo. Book 15 minutes [email protected] Rapax X YouTube
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Rapax
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
Already have an account? Sign in
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Rapax.
Scored by Engagemii on October 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/citusops
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Rapax." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/citusops
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform