AI visibility score
5.8/ 10Fair

▲ 1.8 since Jun 2026

#73,339 of 827,183 in Nonprofits

As of 2026-08-01 · Engagemii indexCheck another site →The index →

AI Visibility Scorecard

Programming Historian

Programming Historian

Unclaimed

programminghistorian.org · Nonprofits

Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Programming Historian, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.

AI engines read this profile 8 times

Claude · Meta AI · ChatGPT · Apple Intelligence

#73,339 of 827,183 in Nonprofits for AI visibility

6

AEO Visibility

i

Borderline · 5.8/10

0

Muse Index Score

i

AI agent readiness

Not agent-ready · 0/100

0

AI Adoption

i

None detected · 0/100

Share

About Programming Historian

from our crawl and measurement

Programming Historian describes itself simply: "The Programming Historian (ISSN: 2397-2068) is released under a CC-BY license." Its AI visibility score is 5.8 out of 10: the engines can find it, but they do not have much to hold on to.

The site is missing structured data describing the business, an llms.txt file and a sitemap.

AI crawlers have visited 3 times in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic) and GPTBot (ChatGPT).

Industry · Nonprofits
Last scored · Aug 1, 2026

The 6 signals AI reads

Strong · Good · Fair · Weak

Structured Data

Weak

Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.

Content Structure

Strong

Clear headings and answer-style content.

Entity Clarity

Fair

How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.

E-E-A-T Signals

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust

Fair

Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.

Technical AEO

Fair

robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.

AI Discoverability

Weak

Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.

Off-page authority

How the web signals your brand to AI

Backlinks

Strong

Inbound links from other sites.

Domain Authority

Fair

Established authority for your domain.

Reference Presence

Strong

Recognized in AI knowledge graphs.

News & Press

Weak

No press coverage found yet.

Community

Fair

Forum and community discussion.

Social Mentions

Weak

No social discussion found yet.

What this score means

Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.8/10, Programming Historian has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.

Is this your brand?

✓

The exact fixes for Programming Historian

✓

Which AI engines already crawl you

✓

Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you

Already have an account? Sign in

Picked for Programming Historian: How-To

How to Get Your Brand Cited by ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude: The Complete AEO Guide

The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.

Continue reading in your free Engagemii portal

Free signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Programming Historian.

Source & Attribution

Scored by Engagemii on August 1, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology

Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/programminghistorian-org

Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Programming Historian." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/programminghistorian-org

Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.

Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform