AI Visibility Scorecard
futureteaming.com · Other
Somewhat visible. AI bots can read Futurebraining, but it is missing the structured signals that push citation rate above competitors.
AI engines read this profile 1 times
Claude
73
AI Naming Predictability
iLikely to be named · 73/100
5
AEO Visibility
iBorderline · 5.1/10
55
Muse Index Score
iAI agent readiness
Transactable · 55/100
8
AI Adoption
iBasic · 8/100
from our crawl and measurement
Futurebraining describes itself simply: "A survey-based diagnostic that shows where AI is strengthening your work, and where it may be making important human capabilities easier to bypass." To AI engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity it is partially visible, scoring 5.1 out of 10, readable in places and missing in others.
Our crawl found structured data on the page (Organization, Product), an llms.txt file for AI models and a readable heading structure. It is missing a sitemap.
AI crawlers have visited once in our tracking, including ClaudeBot (Anthropic).
Strong · Good · Fair · Weak
Structured Data
Good
Organization / LocalBusiness JSON-LD that AI can read.
Content Structure
Strong
Clear headings and answer-style content.
Entity Clarity
Good
How clearly your brand identity reads to AI.
E-E-A-T Signals
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust
Fair
Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trust markers.
Technical AEO
Strong
robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI-bot crawl access.
AI Discoverability
Good
Sitemaps and entity links AI can follow.
How the web signals your brand to AI
Backlinks
Weak
No inbound links found yet.
Domain Authority
Weak
Little domain authority yet.
Reference Presence
Weak
Not in AI knowledge graphs yet.
News & Press
Weak
No press coverage found yet.
Community
Weak
No community discussion yet.
Social Mentions
Weak
No social discussion found yet.
Your AEO score measures whether AI search engines - ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini - can actually read your site and cite it in answers. Roughly two-thirds of sites are invisible to them. At 5.1/10, Futurebraining has a working base to build on - fixable, and the signals above are where to start.
Four levels. Where do you actually sit?
Most people know how often they use AI. Fewer know whether that use is making them more capable. L0 Not Yet Active Not using AI yet. The learning gap may grow if nothing changes. L1 — Assistance Task-by-task Task by task. Useful. Limited. Easy to overestimate. L2 — Co-Intelligence Thinking partner Thinking partner. More output. More leverage. More hidden risk.
Is this your brand?
The exact fixes for Futurebraining
Which AI engines already crawl you
Free AI bot monitoring: see every AI crawler that visits you
The search landscape has fundamentally shifted. While Google still dominates, millions of users now ask questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude instead of typing into a search bar.
Continue reading in your free Engagemii portalFree signup unlocks the full article plus your personalized AEO fix list for Futurebraining.
Scored by Engagemii on September 30, 2026. Methodology: engagemii.com/aeo/methodology
Source URL: https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/futureteaming
Cite this score: Engagemii (2026). "AEO Score for Futurebraining." Retrieved from https://engagemii.com/aeo/brands/futureteaming
Licensed under CC BY 4.0. You may reuse this data with attribution: a visible link to engagemii.com.
Powered by Engagemii - The Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) Platform